Alonso vs. Sauber in fairness
In Australia Sauber’s cars crossed the line in seventh and eight places, they were then disqualified because of a technical infringement on the car. A (supposedly) non performance critical part was a few millimetres outside the allowed margin, Sauber sucked it up, said they were wrong, improved their process and got on with their lives. Ferrari weren’t punished at all for the malfunction on Alonso’s DRS in China.
So what is different about the two cases and why were Sauber punished and not Ferrari? If Sauber are to be believed then their infringement wasn’t a performance gain whereas Ferrari’s most certainly could have been so that argument is moot given that Alonso wasn’t punished. Could it have been the pure infringement of the rules that caused Sauber’s penalty? Well Ferrari’s DRS system was clearly active in an area of the track where it shouldn’t have been and so directly contravened the rules so that can’t have been the motivation behind the difference in punishment. That leaves safety, I can see that the radius of a wing element can be seen as a safety issue where the Ferrari issue might not, but do we want rules applied on the basis of safety? I’m not saying it isn’t important I’m saying that it shouldn’t be the basis for the application of the rules – or not.
There are only two other explanations, one, the perennial conspiracy claim that the FIA are in Ferrari’s pocket or, two, that the stewards just got it wrong and they should have punished Alonso and Ferrari in which case there needs to be more transparency about the decisions they make. So which is it F1?
Popularity: 4%

Recent Comments